FTC Mulches False Bamboo Textile Claims


Share

Four Textile Manufacturers have been charged with falsely labelling rayon clothing as bamboo. While the FTC sends a clear message with these charges, consumers and businesses alike need to understand the hard facts behind bamboo based textiles. By Coral Rose



The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has charged four sellers of clothing and other textile products with "Bamboozling' consumers by deceptively labeling and advertising their products as made of bamboo fiber. These products are actually made of rayon. The companies were also charged with making false and unsubstantiated "green" claims, claiming that their products retain the natural antimicrobial properties of the bamboo plant.

Signaling clearly to the textile industry and consumers that they (FTC) will not allow the sustainable textile industry to become 'the wild west.' And that unsubstantiated green claims in the clothing and other textile related product categories will not be tolerated.

Three of the four companies - Sami Designs, LLC, doing business as (d/b/a) Jonäno; CSE, Inc., d/b/a Mad Mod; and Pure Bamboo, LLC - have settled the FTC's complaints, agreeing to stop making the false claims and to abide by the Commission's Textile Fiber Products Identification Act (Textile Act) and Rules. Litigation continues against the fourth company The M Group, Inc., d/b/a Bamboosa, and its principals.

Well over a year ago, sustainable textile industry academics and professionals raised red-flags on the improper labeling of 'rayon from bamboo' and other erroneous information that was being propagated by manufactures to US brands, retailers and consumers. These professionals spoke up for the integrity of the industry and the FTC listened and took swift action.

Here are the hard facts on Bamboo-based Textiles- They are made of Rayon, they are not antimicrobial, they are not produced in an environmentally friendly manner, nor are they biodegradable.

Why is this such groundbreaking news? Today, many people and organizations may be surprised (or not) to this revelation- Bamboo is not a fiber. Bamboo is not even legally recognized as a fiber by the FTC. According to the FTC textile products including garments must be labeled as "Rayon" or "Rayon from Bamboo."

But yet dozens if not hundreds of producers, manufactures and retailers have been mislabeling product for at least three years, ignoring the FTC regulations. Why? To jump on a hot category; the Green/Sustainable Textile band wagon and reap the short term economic benefit. That in and of itself is not aligned with any company that would aspire to be or sell sustainably produced products. Evidently they jumped in without digging into the supply chain and asking such basic questions as where does my fiber come from and how is it processed?

Supply chain transparency is at the heart of, and one of the basic pillars of any sustainability program/ product. There are potential risks to companies associated with using bamboo as a source for rayon since there is a lack of transparency in the supply chain. Bamboo fails the transparency test from the onset. It is not always clear which type of bamboo is used for fiber, where it is grown, how it is cultivated, harvested-there is no transparency in this the beginning of the journey of bamboo.

As one of the fastest growing plants in the world, bamboo grows to its maximum height in about 3 months and reaches maturity in 3-4 years. It spreads rapidly across large areas. Because of relatively quick growing time and the ability to be grown without fertilizers or pesticides, the fiber is being marketed as an 'eco-green-sustainable fiber.' As noted these claims are false-bamboo is not even recognized as a fiber. There's also no evidence that rayon made from bamboo retains the antimicrobial properties of the bamboo plant, as some sellers and manufacturers claim. Even when bamboo is the "plant source" used to create rayon, no traits of the original plant are left in the finished product

The process to make viscose or rayon fiber from bamboo is the same process used to produce viscose/ rayon from any other plant source. The cellulose is extracted from the bamboo, and then the cellulose is mixed with toxic chemicals to convert the plant pulp into textile quality fiber. All in a process that emits hazardous pollutants into the air.

In this FTC Business Alert, How to Avoid Bamboozling Your Customers, the intention is clear. The FTC is holding manufactures and sellers accountable for their actions. All textile labeling and marketing claims must be truthful. All claims must be "substantiated by reliable and competent scientific evidence."

Have You Been Bamboozled by Bamboo Fabrics?, is an alert released by the FTC, letting consumers know that the soft "bamboo" fabrics on the market today are NOT Green, Eco-Friendly or even Environmentally Friendly they are really rayon, made using harsh chemicals in a process that releases pollutants into the air.

This is the first step in cracking down on those producers, manufactures and retailers that mislead the consumer buying public with false green textile claims. The fact is that this is just the tip of the bamboo shoot. This action by the FTC today is to be acknowledged and applauded. Let's hope that this is a sign that the sustainable textile industry is going to stand up and not going be so easily 'greenwashed'

The FTC first contacted me in April 2008, regarding my February 2008 posting to my blog "Have you Bamboozled by Bamboo" (Yes, the FTC is website savvy!!!) Read that post here.

Resources:

Coral Rose Sustainable Action Leadership Blog

FTC Press Release dated 8/11/09



Coral Rose has more than two decades of experience in the apparel and retail industry as a merchandise buyer and in product development. Coral is founder of Eco-Innovations, a consulting firm focused on supporting businesses with the integration of "sustainable value" into their core strategies, product design, and development. Read her blog here.

Bamboo

Coral, Mo from Bamboosa here. I have a couple of comments I'd like to make. First, we have no issue whatsoever with the labeling requirements and don't even mind getting our hand slapped for not getting our labels changed to the correct fiber content sooner that when we did, which was 1 1/2 years ago. If we had really been on top of this we would have known the requirement sooner. That is our fault and we accept full responsibility for that. I do think the fact that our suppliers have always referred to the fiber as bamboo fiber, as do 99% of the companies involved in selling or marketing the fiber, fabric, textiles, or apparel made from the fiber, should be considered mitigating circumstances. While I am appreciative of the time and effort you put forth to educate your readers, I question some of your statements and how these conclusions were arrived at. You make the statement that the 'hundreds of companies' that have been using the term 'bamboo fiber' to describe their product do so knowingly and willfully and with the intent to deceive the consumer and reap the economic benefits. That is a pretty serious charge and one that I think you would be careful making. These companies, overwhelmingly, are guilty of nothing more than a lack of knowledge about the labeling requirements. You state, flatly, that bamboo based textiles are NOT antimicrobial. I would challenge you to back that statement up with facts. And, by facts, I mean empirical evidence. Have you seen an AATCC 100 or AATCC 147 test that shows that bamboo viscose fabric does not inhibit the growth of bacteria? Can you provide copies of those tests or links to same? How about test results that show the fabric is antimicrobial? Surely in all the research you have done you have seen the tests that are posted at numerous supplier web sites that show antimicrobial behavior in bamboo based fabrics. Do you think all the test that show antimicrobial behavior are manipulated? Or, as you have presumed the guilt of every company selling 'bamboo fiber' textiles or clothing have you also presumed the producers of these test are all liars? The FTC, to our knowledge, has no science behind their assertions regarding a lack of antimicrobial properties. All they have is what you apparently have which is the result of a group of 'sustainable textile industry academics and professionals' coming together and bashing bamboo and drawing conclusions without scientific support. This statement, 'Even when bamboo is the "plant source" used to create rayon, no traits of the original plant are left in the finished product' is another example of unsupported rhetoric. Where did that statement originate? Is there any science to support it? I can't find any. Or this statement, '...mixed with toxic chemicals to convert the plant pulp into textile quality fiber. All in a process that emits hazardous pollutants into the air.' Okay, what pollutants and in what volume? Could you give me the statistics on exactly what toxic chemicals are released into the environment and in what quantity? You also make this statement, "Bamboo fails the transparency test from the onset. It is not always clear which type of bamboo is used for fiber, where it is grown, how it is cultivated, harvested-there is no transparency in this the beginning of the journey of bamboo." How did you determine this? Who can attest to the facts you state? Who investigated this and decided there was a lack of transparency? I would like for you to know this. The fiber that we purchase is produced by Hebei Jigao Chemical Fiber Company in China. The farm where the bamboo is grown is certified under OCIA. The 'wild bamboo' crop is certified under the USDA NOP. The finished fiber has FSC Chain of Custody certification stating that the finished fiber was tracked from the field to the bale and that the finished fiber did in fact come from the certified organically grown bamboo. The finished fiber also has OEKO Tex 100 Class A certification. Based on these certifications I would say your statement is completely without substantiation. I'd be curious to know where you harvested your information in the first place. Coral, it seems to me that you have claimed many things about bamboo that would require scientific testing to substantiate but you offer none. Neither does the FTC or any other anti-bamboo source that I have seen or read. On the other hand, we have many third party certifications and certified test results from accredited laboratories to substantiate the claims we make about bamboo. As I have said many times, Bamboosa will put the environmental footprint of our products up against just about anything on the market. Unless you are looking at organically grown cotton from the US that is ginned, spun, knit, dyed, finished, cut and sewn in the US you will have a hard time finding a textile/apparel product that has a smaller footprint than ours. If I come off as harsh I apologize. But we are being threatened. Our professional lives are at stake and we are tired of people accusing us of greenwashing, being deceptive, acting unethically, and generally being the exact opposite of what we are. And to add insult to injury, while we are being accused of making claims we cannot substantiate we are being attacked by people making claims they cannot substantiate. Mo

Public/journalists bambooled by FTC

Coral, I am not familiar with the views of this website or its writers. That said, if you have an open mind, and aren't accustomed to thinking that your government's statements are always correct, then I would like to suggest that you do a little more research on this topic. There is much more to this story than the FTC's statements. The FTC has got itself into hot water...many times in the past, for making unsubstantiated and fallacious claims against small businesses. In fact, they have been reprimanded by Federal Judges, for doing so. I wouldn't be so quick to assume that their statements are all that. Did you know that if you were to apply their "bamboo" standards for biodegradable, a head of lettuce would not be biodegradable. Does that make sense to you? You can learn more about that here: Ftc claims fruits and vegetables are not biodegradable Also, "rayon from bamboo" is not the same as traditional rayon. You can find proof of that here: ftc claims bamboo and rayon are one in the same There are many other posts on that blog, that are dedicated to telling the other side of the story. If you read some of them, with an open mind...I think you might look at this whole issue in a different light. Thanks for the opportunity, Doug

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
Security Check - Type the numbers/letters below
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.