|
February 6, 2008 
|  | ||
| A Guide for Sustainable Business Innovators | |||
Home | Climate News & Ideas | Connections | Events | About |
|||
What Am I "Offsetting" Again?
Amid all the hoopla surrounding the New York Giants' surprise upset, you might have missed the small but noteworthy green controversy around the Super Bowl: The big game was going to be "carbon neutral," but the NFL backed off the claim given concerns about the carbon calculations (which didn't include travel to the game, the largest component of the footprint). It's hard to know what the right approach is these days.
What exactly is an offset? In theory it's reduction in carbon emissions somewhere - through some action like planting a tree or paying for the spinning of a wind turbine - equal to your own emissions. Sounds easy, right? But the reality is very messy since the mechanisms for creating and buying emissions reductions and credits are incredibly varied. There are dozens of types of offsets with a corresponding alphabet soup of acronyms that tie to regulated trading markets (some FAQs on the EU's system here (PDF), voluntary markets (Chicago Climate Exchange), or other amorphous actions companies take. I won't attempt to explain it all (and couldn't if I tried). There are plenty of reports (PDF) and many good articles that lay out the options, mainly for consumers, for measuring and paying for offsets (see one no-nonsense take here). 
So this issue looks at how you might think about your strategic choices in a mainly voluntary world (in the U.S. for the time being). But first, I'd suggest using offsets as a last resort. The first steps should be to look at your footprint, create solid metrics, redesign processes and products, and so on...all to cut emissions aggressively (and create a ton of value by the way). Then buy or install renewable energy on your facilities where possible. Then worry about carbon offsets for the remainder. (Take a look at railway company Eurostar's three-part plan for a good example.)
Secondly, I'd stipulate that renewable energy credits (RECs), which are fundamentally a contribution to the production of renewable energy and encourage the growth of that industry, are not 100% the same as fully counterbalancing your emissions, and thus they are somewhat less than ideal (see BusinessWeek's scathing article. Luckily some smart people are working hard to define a quality offset. Until unified standards emerge, however, they may be the best option for the emissions that are left after you reduce as much as you can. I see a few main questions that you will need to answer once you've decided to do this offset thing:
~Andrew Winston, Founder, Winston Eco-Strategies, Co-author, Green to Gold (Read his "Eco-Advantage" blog here.) Comments or questions? Join Andrew and other readers online at the Eco-Strategies Forum. #1: What Should You Offset? 
How much of your value chain impact should you try to offset? The GHG Protocol Initiative is one well-regarded set of standards that can help you define your boundaries. Your own direct emissions are defined as "Scope 1" emissions, for example, while Scopes 2 and 3 cover areas like indirect emissions from your utility and your supply chain emissions. Most companies focus on Scope 1 and some have made large renewables purchases to cover their direct footprint (the EPA keeps a running list of the biggest renewables buyers). A few companies look at all three Scopes and beyond. Fiji Water, with some guidance from Conservation International, is measuring all emissions from production of packaging materials, to manufacturing, transport, and even employee travel. The company has set a goal to go "carbon negative," offsetting 120% of these already expansively defined emissions.
#2: How Should You Offset? 
The gold standard is buying renewable energy directly, but that really works only for your own operations (Scope 1). Take the example of U.K. cable company BskyB. As director of corporate responsibility Ben Simson tells me, the company has committed to buying the entire output of a new wind farm on the Isle of Sky (a coincidental name that Simson jokes is "a branding person's dream"). The 11 turbines will offset 80% of the company's direct emissions. But BskyB isn't stopping there, trying out innovative initiatives to reduce and offset indirect and value chain emissions: Each employee gets a "carbon credit card" and earns points for biking to work, teleconferencing, and so on; in a test program, the cable installers gave homeowners three energy-saving CFL bulbs to offset the energy use of the cable box - customers loved it, and more importantly, they got it. The company is also using its considerable media assets to promote awareness through programming.
#3: Who Is Doing the Offsetting? 
To put it bluntly, who's paying? It's usually the company, from utility PG&E handing out 1 million CFL's to Allstate offering to offset drivers' auto emissions. But other companies are offering customers a way to pitch in. Dell's Plant a Tree program lets buyers offset the energy-related emissions of the Dell products they select. And some big car rental companies are mixing methods, charging for the offset but matching the donation as well. It's a fine line between placing the burden on customers and driving customer engagement, but it's a good practice to raise awareness.
#4: How Are Communicating Your Results? 
How are you verifying and reporting the outcome of your carbon offset program? More to the point, are you verifying at all? (I recommend it highly.) Fiji, like other companies, is using an external consultant to verify the value chain analyses. But the big topic du jour is how companies report and market their claims. As fellow SLM contributor Will Sarni wrote in a recent editorial, "companies eager to flaunt 'carbon neutral' programs are on a collision course with the Federal Trade Commission, NGOs, and a public increasingly skeptical on the value of carbon offsets." It's the Wild West out there right now, but some protocols are gaining ground as safe havens for confused companies. Watch this ever-evolving space - regulations may be tightening soon.
 We want to hear from you! Post your comments or questions, and we'll feature the best of them here.
|
Forward to a Friend!
Save the Date for SB08! 
Mark your calendar and plan now to join your peers at Sustainable Brands '08, where we'll explore together the latest in innovation for sustainable brands. The event will be held in California at the Hyatt Regency Monterey Resort from June 2-5, 2008.
Eco-Advantage Salon Tour! Andrew's Eco-Advantage Salon Tour is coming to a city near you. Watch here for information on our next locations, dates, and participants. New to SLM Sustainable Business Newsletters? Check out these other targeted topics and keep yourself up to speed on how to drive value through sustainable innovation throughout your organization. Find Peers and Partners If you haven't already joined the fastest growing online sustainable business community, create a profile now and start connecting. Books & Media "No executive can afford to ignore the green wave sweeping the business world. [Co-authors] Esty and Winston show how to make sustainability a core element of strategy-and profit from it." -Chad Holliday, CEO, DuPont Advertise on SLM! Become a Sustainable Life Media advertiser or sponsor and reach thousands of business leaders looking for product or service solutions to help them build their sustainability story. Click here to learn more. Have a story you want told? Send it to us! Solution Providers |
This work is licensed under a CreativeCommons License. Copyright Sustainable Life Media Inc. 2008
| Home | Terms of Use | Privacy | Unsubscribe | Contact | How We Can Help | Partners |